Husband Criticised for Vain Persistence in Contested Divorce Case
23rd January 2019Back to articles
Contested divorces are a rarity, which is hardly surprising given that, following two years of separation, a marriage can be ended by agreement.
However, they do still occur and, in one such case, a judge was critical of a husband who wasted family money in a vain attempt to prove that his wife was to blame for the end of their relationship.
The wife petitioned for divorce on the basis that, for 22 years of their marriage, the husband had been having an adulterous relationship with her best friend. He admitted as much, but lodged his own petition, claiming that it was the wife's unreasonable behaviour that had led to the collapse of the marriage.
In dismissing the husband's petition after a costly three-day hearing, the judge noted that the couple both wished to divorce, and that could have been amicably achieved after the required time period. In the circumstances, the husband's case was entirely futile and represented a huge waste of money.
The prolonged dispute as to where responsibility for the broken marriage lay only served to further sour family relations and arose from the husband's vanity and desire to control the situation.
In upholding the wife's petition and granting her a decree nisi, the judge noted that the marriage was agreed to have broken down irretrievably. She accepted that the wife found it intolerable to live with the husband and that she had not done so since discovering his adultery. There was no truth in the husband's allegations that she had behaved unreasonably.
Describing the case as extraordinary, the judge observed that only about 20 contested divorce trials take place in England and Wales annually.
For advice on dealing with any family law issue or the dissolution of a relationship, contact us at any of our offices below:
Devizes – 01380 722311
Chippenham – 01249 478333
Royal Wootton Bassett – 01793 853200
Marlborough – 01672 518620